ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Assessing EHR Cohort Fitness With Partially Paired Registry Data: A New Statistical Approach Applied to Maternal Health in OneFlorida.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cohort discovery using electronic health records (EHR) supports research recruitment and pragmatic clinical trials; however, the validity of EHR-derived cohorts depends on whether patient characteristics recorded in EHR are representative of the target population. While methods exist for assessing internal validity, no published methods address continuous outcomes when EHR and reference population data partially overlap at the individual level. We present a novel statistical approach for assessing EHR data cohort fitness when partially overlapping data are available from an EHR and a registry. For continuous outcomes, we derived an explicit test accommodating unequal variances and correlation between paired records. For binary outcomes, we recommend generalized linear mixed models with a binomial distribution and logit link. We demonstrate the new approach using maternal health data from the OneFlorida+ Data Trust (n = 37,200) and Florida birth certificate records (n = 210,910) from 2021. OneFlorida+ EHR had higher rates of Black race identification, residence in areas of higher social deprivation, and pre-existing diabetes or hypertension, while showing lower probabilities of gestational complications. Maternal age, height, and cesarean delivery rates were not meaningfully different between data sources. Observed differences may reflect the academic health center composition of OneFlorida+ partner sites; however, substantially higher missingness in OneFlorida+ EHR than birth certificate records for race, ethnicity, and location of residence suggests that data capture differences play a role. This replicable statistical method provides researchers with quantitative tools to assess cohort fitness and is applicable to other clinical research networks where EHR and registry data overlap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.