ReviewEndocrine2026
Osteoporosis as a chronic disease: an expert narrative review and practical recommendations on long-term management and sequential therapy after denosumab discontinuation.
Review in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDenosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand, leading to marked and sustained reductions in fracture risk in osteoporosis. Due to its reversible mechanism and lack of skeletal retention, treatment interruption causes rebound bone turnover, accelerated bone mineral density (BMD) loss, and increased vertebral fracture risk. Optimising denosumab therapy therefore requires a long-term management strategy incorporating uninterrupted dosing and planned sequential antiresorptive therapy.
methodsThis expert narrative review summarises evidence on denosumab pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and discontinuation management and provides practical recommendations informed by the published literature and the clinical experience of the author panel. No formal Delphi process, voting procedure, evidence-grading framework, or predefined consensus threshold was used.
resultsMain topics discussed included transition strategies after withdrawal, particularly alendronate (or zoledronic acid), timing of initiation, and biomarker-guided monitoring using serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTX). This paper also addresses management in special populations (chronic kidney disease, glucocorticoid exposure, malignancy, endocrine disorders) and evaluates health-system factors including infusion capacity, adherence, and coordinated primary-specialist care.
conclusionDenosumab should not be discontinued without subsequent potent antiresorptive therapy. Sequential alendronate or zoledronic acid within six to seven months of the final injection, guided by CTX and BMD monitoring, is likely to be the most effective strategy in preventing rebound bone loss. Structured transition pathways are essential for sustained skeletal protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42965761What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.