ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Cellular senescence in calcific aortic valve disease: are we ready for senolytic therapy?
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in the Western countries and carries significant morbidity and mortality, yet no pharmacological therapy has demonstrated efficacy in modifying its natural history. Once regarded as a passive degenerative process, CAVD is now recognized as an actively regulated disease driven by endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, dysregulated mineral metabolism, and cellular senescence, which collectively drive progressive fibrotic remodeling and calcification of the valve leaflets through both dystrophic and osteogenic mechanisms. This review examines the pharmacological strategies that have been investigated or are currently under evaluation to slow CAVD progression, encompassing lipid-lowering agents, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, bone resorption inhibitors, vitamin K supplementation, and nitric oxide pathway modulators. Despite strong biological rationale and encouraging observational or preclinical data, each of these approaches has thus far failed to demonstrate consistent disease, modifying efficacy in prospective randomized trials, reflecting the complexity of CAVD pathophysiology and the historical lack of mechanistic precision in patient selection and trial design. Emerging evidence suggests that cellular senescence may represent a unifying and potentially actionable therapeutic target, bridging endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and active calcification within a single pathophysiological framework. Preclinical studies demonstrate that senolytic clearance of senescent cells reduces calcification in atherosclerosic and hypercholesterolemic vascular models provide a compelling rationale for extending this approach to valvular targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42965583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.