ReviewKidney medicine2026
Clinical Application of Hemadsorption in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: An Adapted English Republication of the Chinese HA-MHD Consensus.
Review in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accumulation of protein-bound uremic toxins and middle- to large-molecular-weight toxins in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) results in long-term complications. Hemadsorption (HA) can efficiently remove these uremic toxins and reduce the risk of long-term complications in MHD patients. The Chinese HA-MHD Consensus Working Group has revised and updated the 2021 Shanghai Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Haemoadsorption in Maintenance Haemodialysis Patients to further standardize clinical application of HA and reflect the latest evidence. Based on an extensive literature search, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework, and the modified Delphi method, the working group formulated 27 evidence-based recommendations regarding patient populations, session frequency, treatment modalities, precautions, and adverse reactions. This consensus systematically delineates the clinical thresholds and rationales for utilizing HA across three core dimensions: routine treatment regimens, intensive treatment regimens, and long-term complication risk management to provide comprehensive guidance. Furthermore, the consensus provides detailed guidance on individualized operational parameters to maximize both safety and treatment efficacy. This consensus aims to provide the latest guiding opinions for the rational and standardized application of HA therapy in patients receiving MHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.