Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42964994›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026

Adaptive Intelligent Microneedles for Sustained Wound Healing: Translating Microenvironment Signals into Stage-Specific Therapeutic Responses.

Sammar Fathy Elhabal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sammar Fathy ElhabalDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, New Egypt University (NEU), 6th of October City, Giza, 12585, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7970-2288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic wounds are a complex of interconnected issues, including biofilm-associated infection, persistent inflammation, oxidative stress, altered pH, metabolic dysfunction, proteolytic imbalance, hypoxia, vascular impairment and poor tissue regeneration. These anomalies encourage endogenous activation of smart microneedles (MNs) and prevent healing. MNs can transition from passive local medication delivery to adaptive therapy, which adjusts to the biological changes in chronic wounds. Methods: This review introduces an adaptive wound-interface framework to evaluate smart MN strategies for chronic wound healing. A pathology-driven approach links wound-associated cues to responsive materials, activation mechanisms, therapeutic functions, healing stages, and translational requirements. It examines ROS-, pH-, glucose-, enzyme-, bacteria-, and hypoxia-responsive systems; advanced MN architectures; and their integration with infection control, immunomodulation, vascular restoration, tissue regeneration, and stage-specific therapy. Results: The evidence shows a clear progression from simple drug-loaded MNs to systems in which pathological signals actively tune material degradation, catalytic activity, therapeutic release, or sequential therapy. Biofilm, chronic inflammation, vascular dysfunction, and impaired regeneration are common therapeutic targets. Endogenous triggers could be ROS, pH, glucose, and disease-related enzymes. Antibiofilm therapy, redox normalization, immune reprogramming, oxygen regulation, angiogenesis, re-epithelialization, extracellular matrix remodeling, and scar control are increasingly coordinated by compartmentalized or sequential architectures and responsive chemistries in advanced platforms. Clinically relevant activation thresholds, stimulus-response reproducibility, polymicrobial biofilms, irregular wound mechanics, sterilization, nanomaterial stability and safety, manufacturing scale-up, and regulatory translation are major challenges as functional complexity increases. Conclusion: Smart MNs are evolving from localized drug-delivery devices to physiologically educated therapeutic interfaces that may manage therapy time, location, and manner using the chronic wound microenvironment. Not the most responsive components, clinically viable systems will feature biologically meaningful sensing, temporally appropriate therapy, repeatable fabrication, and demonstrable benefit over current wound care. Instead of wound closure, future development should include clinically established stimulus ranges, stage-adaptive therapeutic programming, translationally practical designs, and enduring functional tissue restoration.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsBiofilmsHumansMicroneedle Drug Deliverybiofilmdiabetic woundsimmunomodulationmicroenvironment-responsive drug deliveryoxidative stressstage-adaptive treatmenttissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID42964994
PMCPMC13720900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.