ReviewCureus2026
Brexpiprazole in India and the United States: A Comparative Review of Regulatory Status, Clinical Evidence, Market Access, and Evidence Gaps.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brexpiprazole is a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator first cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 for adults with schizophrenia and as an adjunct to antidepressants in major depressive disorder (MDD); later authorizations extended its use to adolescent schizophrenia and to agitation arising in dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Over the past decade, randomized controlled trials, long-term open-label extensions, and analyses of real-world claims have converged on a consistent efficacy profile and a tolerability profile that has generally been favorable, although direct head-to-head comparisons with other second-generation agents remain limited. The evidence base and access environment differ markedly between the two countries. In the United States, brexpiprazole is an established product with an extensive clinical evidence base supplemented by real-world claims, utilization, safety, and economic analyses. In contrast, India has only recently received regulatory approval for brexpiprazole, and brexpiprazole-specific clinical, real-world utilization, pricing, reimbursement, and pharmacoeconomic data remain limited. This narrative review consolidates the pharmacology, clinical-trial findings, safety record, and health-economic data on brexpiprazole and contrasts the mature evidence environment of the United States with the emerging one in India. The principal Indian evidence gap is therefore no longer regulatory recognition but the generation of local data on availability, affordability, utilization, effectiveness, and pharmacoeconomic value. Framed as a collaboration between Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, and New York Medical College at St Clare's and St Mary's, New Jersey, the review aims to support the equitable and evidence-based uptake of newer antipsychotics in emerging settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.