ArticleCureus2026
Trajectories of Glycemia Following Acute Pancreatitis: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute pancreatitis (AP) may cause persistent disturbances in glucose metabolism that extend beyond the resolution of acute inflammatory episodes. However, the progression of glycemic abnormalities during the early recovery period remains insufficiently characterized, emphasizing the need for prospective longitudinal evaluation. We aimed to evaluate glycemia trajectories after an episode of AP over a 12-month follow-up by determining the cumulative incidence of new-onset prediabetes and diabetes and assessing longitudinal changes in glycemic parameters.
methodsThis prospective longitudinal observational study included 77 adults diagnosed with AP without preexisting diabetes who were followed up for 12 months. We recorded clinical characteristics, pancreatitis severity scores, laboratory investigations, and fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at baseline, six months, and 12 months. Statistical analyses were performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance for longitudinal comparisons, Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests, and McNemar's test for categorical outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsAmong the 77 participants, 45 (58.4%) were male participants, and 39 (50.6%) had biliary pancreatitis. During follow-up, the incidence of prediabetes increased significantly from 12 (15.6%) at six months to 19 (24.7%) at 12 months (p = 0.023), while that of diabetes increased from three (3.9%) to five (6.5%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.480). Overall, glycemic abnormalities increased significantly from 15 (19.5%) to 24 (31.2%) (p = 0.008). Repeated-measures analysis demonstrated a significant increase in FBG levels from 96 ± 9.5 to 106 ± 17.0 mg/dL (p < 0.001), PPBG from 127 ± 16.5 to 150 ± 35.0 mg/dL (p = 0.003), and HbA1c from 5.52% ± 0.11% to 6.06 ± 0.40% (p < 0.001) over the 12-month period. Glycemic trajectory analysis showed that 35 (45.5%) participants remained in the normal-stable group, 35 (45.5%) exhibited a moderately stable pattern, and seven (9.1%) demonstrated a high glycemic trajectory.
conclusionProgressive deterioration in glycemic control occurs during the first year following AP, with nearly one-third of the patients developing prediabetes or diabetes. HbA1c demonstrated the greatest longitudinal increase and may serve as a sensitive marker for identifying patients at risk for post-pancreatitis dysglycemia. These findings support routine metabolic surveillance after AP to facilitate early diagnosis and timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.