ReviewClinical and translational medicine2026
Toward a digital urinary biopsy for early risk stratification in diabetic kidney disease: Anchoring shed cells, vesicles, and cell-free DNA to spatial kidney cell states.
Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide. However, albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which define and stage DKD, report established injury and do not resolve the cellular heterogeneity underlying variable progression. Urine, the only biofluid to traverse every nephron segment, carries shed cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA), each retaining information about its cell of origin. MAIN BODY: This review develops the concept of a digital urinary biopsy, in which the three compartments are read together against spatial single-cell kidney atlases to infer non-invasively which cell states are active and whether niche-associated programs are engaged, an approach we term atlas-anchored molecular profiling. For each compartment, we tabulate study population, sample size, processing, assay, performance and validation status. Because shed-cell RNA, selectively sorted vesicle cargo and cfDNA methylation differ in origin, measurement scale and bias, each requires its own reference matrix, sampling function and background terms. All three carry renal information in feasibility studies, yet none is a validated clinical assay in DKD. Moreover, a cfDNA methylation reference at the required resolution is lacking, and no named computational method has been tested on urine.
conclusionWe therefore present the framework as a structured research hypothesis and define the required validation, from analytical and clinical validity to prospective demonstration of utility, with non-albuminuric DKD, which albuminuria-based screening misses, as the index use case. It offers a testable route to cell-resolved, non-invasive staging of DKD rather than a demonstrated capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.