Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42948672›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2026

Perioperative Blood Management in General Surgery: Recent Advances, Current Limitations, and the Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence-A Narrative Review.

Long Zhang, Guoxin Liu, Shuyuan Guo, Yan Wu, Jing Yu, Xin Song, Hao Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Long ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157011, People's Republic of China.
Guoxin LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157011, People's Republic of China.
Shuyuan GuoDepartment of General Surgery, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157011, People's Republic of China.
Yan WuDepartment of General Surgery, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157011, People's Republic of China.
Jing YuDepartment of General Surgery, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157011, People's Republic of China.
Xin SongDepartment of Pathology, Mudanjiang Cancer Hospital, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157011, People's Republic of China.
Hao JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang, 157011, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient blood management (PBM) is a patient-centered approach to blood use that aligns with modern medical practice. It is based on multidisciplinary collaboration and evidence-based medicine. Its aim is to improve clinical outcomes by correcting preoperative anemia, reducing perioperative blood loss, standardizing transfusion practices, and optimizing the management of coagulation function. Patients undergoing general surgery, particularly complex liver surgery or gastrointestinal cancer surgery, often face preoperative anemia, intraoperative bleeding, increased transfusion requirements, and postoperative coagulation abnormalities. These factors make perioperative blood management more complex. This narrative review searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for relevant studies published over the past 10 years. It summarizes recent advances, current limitations, and challenges in the clinical translation of perioperative blood management in general surgery. This review focuses on the assessment and management of preoperative anemia, bleeding control and hemostatic strategies, transfusion management, coagulation monitoring, and thrombotic risk management. It also discusses recent advances and current limitations in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for risk prediction, clinical decision support, and individualized management. Current evidence suggests that PBM may help optimize perioperative care in general surgery. AI/ML may also support clinical decision-making by predicting bleeding risk, estimating transfusion requirements, and stratifying thrombotic risk. However, studies specifically focusing on general surgery patients remain limited. Most available evidence comes from cardiac surgery, orthopedics, or other surgical populations. In addition, current prediction models still have several limitations, including insufficient external validation, a lack of prospective evaluation, and limited interpretability. Therefore, these models should currently be used only as tools to support clinical judgment. Therefore, future studies should include more multicenter prospective research in general surgery populations. AI/ML-assisted decision support should also be further explored within standardized PBM pathways to improve the precision and standardization of perioperative blood management in general surgery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegeneral surgerymachine learningperioperative blood management

Identifiers

PMID42948672
PMCPMC13712221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.