ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Bioengineering technologies for enabling biomedical research in space.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustained human presence in space requires research platforms capable of capturing the physiological consequences of microgravity, radiation, and isolation, while operating within the severe mass, volume, and crew-time constraints of orbital missions. This review surveys bioengineering strategies that have been adapted to meet these demands: tissue engineering, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, tissue chips, and biosensors. Tissue-engineered constructs and human stem cell-derived organoids provide human-relevant alternatives to animal models and exploit the absence of gravitational settling to generate more uniform, complex multicellular structures, though vascularization and long-term functional stability remain unresolved challenges. 3D bioprinting in microgravity reduces construct collapse and sedimentation-driven defects, and extrusion-based platforms such as the ISS BioFabrication Facility have already demonstrated in-flight tissue printing, though mechanical equivalence to native tissue and photopolymerization-based approaches remain areas of active development. Tissue chips offer a small-footprint, human-specific alternative to traditional cell culture and have been used to model organ systems ranging from cardiac and skeletal muscle tissue to the blood-brain barrier, supporting both disease modeling and radiation countermeasure testing in orbit. Biosensors, whether deployed independently or integrated with tissue chip platforms, enable real-time, in-situ data collection that reduces reliance on crew time and sample return. Together, these technologies are converging toward unified, autonomous platforms for tissue fabrication, culture, and monitoring in space. We discuss the current state, limitations, and future directions of each approach, and highlight the opportunities for their integration to advance both astronaut health and terrestrial regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.