ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Promoting health through sports-medicine integration in China: a narrative and conceptual review of challenges, international.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical inactivity and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) pose sustained challenges to population health, while prevention, clinical care, rehabilitation, and community-based physical activity are often delivered through separate professional and administrative systems. In China, sports-medicine integration has been promoted as a strategy to connect national fitness, health promotion, chronic disease management, and rehabilitation. However, its conceptual boundaries, implementation mechanisms, evidence base, and potential risks require more critical examination. This article uses a narrative and conceptual review approach. This structured narrative and conceptual review used PubMed as the principal bibliographic database, supplemented by backward citation searching, targeted searches of authoritative governmental and professional sources, and relevant Chinese-language literature. Sources were screened according to predefined relevance criteria and critically appraised according to study design, methodological rigor, directness, recency, and source authority. Seminal conceptual sources were retained without a lower date limit, whereas evidence describing contemporary health systems and implementation was preferentially drawn from 2000-August 2026, with post-2020 literature prioritized where available. Peer-reviewed empirical studies, systematic/scoping reviews, and authoritative documents from national governments, the World Health Organization (WHO), and professional bodies were prioritized over commercial market reports, media commentary, and indirect citations. Evidence was synthesized thematically rather than quantitatively. The literature supports a stronger role for physical activity in health promotion and chronic disease prevention, but it does not justify treating sports-medicine integration as a self-evidently effective policy solution. China has important enabling conditions, including national policy support and growing exercise-prescription capacity, yet implementation remains constrained by administrative fragmentation, uneven local capacity, incomplete professional credentialing, financing uncertainty, and limited evaluation at scale. International experience illustrates complementary strengths: the United States has developed professional certification and health-system implementation models; Germany links medical recommendations with qualified community sport and insurance-based prevention; and Japan combines national physical activity guidance with health-promotion and community-care structures. Sports-medicine integration should be understood as a coordinated, risk-stratified health-service strategy rather than as the medicalization of all physical activity. Future development in China should emphasize clear governance, standardized referral pathways, recognized professional scopes of practice, sustainable financing, interoperable data systems, and explicit evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, scalability, and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.