ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Plant-derived nanovesicles in kidney disease: emerging preclinical evidence and translational challenges.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-derived nanovesicles (PDNVs) are lipid-bilayer nanoparticles isolated from plant extracellular fluids, juices, or tissues. Preparations obtained from disrupted tissues may contain both extracellular vesicles and membrane particles formed during processing, making product identity central to interpretation. Seven direct renal studies have examined native or engineered PDNVs in cisplatin- and sepsis-associated acute kidney injury, diabetic kidney disease, hyperuricemia-associated renal injury, and calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Current evidence supports three overlapping modes of use: renal cellular protection, oral modulation of intestinal and metabolic pathways, and engineered cargo delivery. Reported effects involve mitochondrial function, endoplasmic reticulum stress, ferroptosis, inflammation, microbiota, and host metabolism, but mechanistic support is uneven. SLC7A11 perturbation provides functional evidence for ferroptosis in one model, whereas most microbiota-metabolite-kidney relationships remain associative. Fluorescent tissue signals also do not establish intact-vesicle delivery or cell-specific kidney targeting. This review distinguishes direct renal PDNV evidence from adjacent plant-bioactive nanomedicines and phytochemical-modified mammalian extracellular vesicles, and critically examines product identity, preparation, dose, biodistribution, mechanism, safety, and clinical translation. No registered renal PDNV trial was identified; existing human studies concern nonrenal mucosal or intestinal applications and plant-vesicle-assisted cargo delivery. Progress toward renal translation will depend on reproducible manufacturing, mechanism-linked potency, quantitative biodistribution, causal validation, and repeated-dose safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.