ReviewMedComm2026
Sepsis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis remains a major cause of global morbidity and mortality despite advances in recognition, antimicrobial therapy, and organ support, reflecting its biological heterogeneity and the absence of broadly effective host-directed treatments. Here, we synthesize recent evidence across the three domains that define contemporary sepsis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Global and regional data indicate a persistently high but uneven burden, shaped by differences in case definitions, population structure, healthcare resources, and ascertainment. Mechanistically, sepsis is best viewed as an interconnected systems disorder in which hyperinflammation and immunoparalysis coexist with oxidative stress, endothelial and coagulation injury, immunometabolic dysfunction, gut dysbiosis, mitochondrial damage, and dysregulated programmed cell death, collectively driving organ dysfunction. Current management remains centered on timely antimicrobials, source control, individualized fluid and vasopressor therapy, corticosteroids, and organ support, while biomarker-guided immunotherapy and other host-directed strategies remain investigational. Recent randomized trials have mainly refined how established treatments are delivered rather than identified a universally effective new therapy. We also evaluate preclinical evidence for natural compounds targeting inflammatory and cell-death networks and highlight persistent methodological, pharmacokinetic, and translational barriers. Integrating rigorous phenotyping, mechanistic biomarkers, and guideline-based care may provide a more realistic path toward precision sepsis therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.