ReviewObesity surgery2026
Anatomy-Aware Effects of Biliopancreatic-Limb Length in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trials labelled "long" biliopancreatic limb (BPL) test different Roux-en-Y gastric bypass configurations. We separated fixed-alimentary-limb BPL extension, reciprocal limb reallocation, distalization, and compound changes. The registered primary outcome was 12-month HbA1c in baseline type 2 diabetes. Eighty reports represented 39 studies (14 randomized trials, 25 cohorts). Primary HbA1c differences were - 0.18% points (95% CI - 0.59 to + 0.23) for fixed-limb extension and - 0.33 (- 0.60 to - 0.06) for reallocation; these classes were not pooled. Two fixed-limb trials (146 participants) yielded a secondary 12-month percentage total weight-loss difference of + 0.36 points (- 0.60 to + 1.32). Glycemic evidence remains sparse and configuration-specific. Fixed-limb evidence is inconsistent with a 5-point weight-loss gain but does not exclude smaller effects or identify the isolated BPL effect. KEY POINTS: • Only three of 14 RCTs tested fixed-AL BPL extension; one measured the CC. • Primary 12-month HbA1c could not be pooled within an anatomical class. • Fixed-total reallocation suggested a modest HbA1c package effect. • Allocation shifts and distalization cannot identify an isolated BPL effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42945023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.