ReviewNutrients2026
Natural Products in Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review of Mechanistic Insights into Metabolic Regulation and Therapeutic Potential.
Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a complex metabolic disease characterized by persistent hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. In addition to disturbances in glucose metabolism, the disease is accompanied by abnormalities in mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, lipid and protein metabolism, and chronic inflammation that contribute to progressive tissue injury and the development of vascular complications. Although current pharmacological therapies effectively improve glycemic control, many patients continue to experience disease progression and diabetes-associated complications, highlighting the need for complementary therapeutic strategies that target multiple pathogenic mechanisms. Growing evidence suggests that naturally occurring bioactive compounds may provide such multitarget benefits. Plant-derived polyphenols, medicinal herbs, culinary spices, and functional foods have demonstrated antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, and insulin-sensitizing properties in experimental and clinical studies. Compounds including curcumin, honey, garlic, fenugreek, cumin, shilajit, and guduchi have been reported to influence several molecular pathways involved in diabetes pathogenesis, including NF-κB-mediated inflammatory signaling, oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress, PPARγ activation, advanced glycation end-product formation, and pancreatic β-cell preservation. This review critically examines current evidence regarding the role of natural products in diabetes management, integrating findings from cell-based studies, animal models, and human clinical investigations. Particular emphasis is placed on the interplay between oxidative stress, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and metabolic regulation, as these interconnected processes represent key drivers of disease progression. In addition to summarizing established mechanisms, the review discusses current limitations, translational challenges, and future research priorities. A deeper understanding of how natural products modulate these pathways may facilitate the development of evidence-based adjunctive strategies to improve long-term metabolic health and reduce the burden of diabetic complications. This narrative review critically synthesizes published peer-reviewed mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical evidence regarding selected natural products and functional foods relevant to diabetes mellitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.