ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Methylsulfonylmethane as a Bioactive Nutraceutical: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, Combination Therapy, Dosing, and Safety.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methylsulfonylmethane (MSM; dimethyl sulfone) is an organosulfur nutraceutical used primarily for joint symptoms, although its molecular actions and clinical applicability beyond osteoarthritis remain uncertain. This narrative review integrates pharmacological, preclinical, and human evidence on MSM, with emphasis on musculoskeletal disorders, multi-ingredient formulations, dosing, safety, toxicology, and clinical monitoring. Experimental studies implicate NF-κB and NLRP3 signaling, redox regulation, sulfur metabolism, and AMPK/mTOR/ULK1-related autophagy; however, most pathway-level evidence remains preclinical. Human clinical evidence is comparatively most developed for knee osteoarthritis, although it remains limited to small, short-term randomized trials reporting modest symptomatic improvement rather than established structural or disease-modifying benefit. Recent evidence syntheses also identify signals for glucosamine-MSM and glucosamine-chondroitin-MSM combinations, although certainty is limited and the independent contribution of MSM cannot be determined. Tendon studies largely evaluate multi-ingredient products, preventing attribution of benefit to MSM alone. Evidence in cardiometabolic disease, gastrointestinal health, exercise recovery, and toxicant exposure is preliminary. MSM is not a direct metal chelator and should not replace established chelation therapy. Short-term studies have used approximately 1-6 g/day with generally mild gastrointestinal adverse effects, whereas long-term safety, formal drug-interaction data, and clinically validated biomarker-guided dosing remain undefined. MSM should therefore be considered an adjunct with indication-dependent evidence rather than a broadly applicable anti-inflammatory or detoxification supplement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.