ReviewBiomedicines2026
Plant-Derived Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Cardiometabolic Disorders: A Critical Review of Natural Scaffolds and Experimental Evidence.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiometabolic disorders, including obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, remain major biomedical problems closely linked to vascular complications. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is a clinically validated therapeutic target because inhibition of this enzyme prolongs the activity of incretin hormones and supports glucose-dependent insulin secretion. This review compiles and critically evaluates plant-derived DPP-4 inhibitors, with emphasis on chemical class, enzyme source, quantitative activity, assay interpretability, and the translational relevance of reported findings. The available literature indicates that flavonoids and polyphenolic compounds dominate the field, although assay heterogeneity, medium effects, potential aggregation, and insufficient selectivity data limit interpretation. Among natural scaffolds, chalcones and aurones, including lanceoletin, leptosidin, xanthoangelol, chalconaringenin 2'-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, and aureusidin 6-O-β-D-glucopyranoside, represent comparatively well-supported lead-like scaffolds that warrant further standardized evaluation. The evidence does not support using plant-derived DPP-4 inhibitors as substitutes for approved antidiabetic drugs. Their greatest value lies in expanding chemical space and providing lead-like scaffolds for standardized potency, selectivity, kinetic and preclinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.