Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42939881›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Therapeutic Redox Reprogramming in Breast Cancer: From Antioxidant Modulation to Precision Nanomedicine.

Nina Kummer, Sabina Gayibova, Takhir Aripov, Désirée Gül, Mustafa Dolaz, Burcu Önal Acet, Leyla Polat Köse, Mehmet Odabaşı, Roland H Stauber, Ömür Acet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nina KummerNanobiomedicine/Molecular and Cellular Oncology, ENT, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
Sabina GayibovaLaboratory of Plant Cytoprotectors, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Named After A. Sadykov, Mirzo Ulugbek, 83, Tashkent 100125, Uzbekistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8373-5234
Takhir AripovLaboratory of Plant Cytoprotectors, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Named After A. Sadykov, Mirzo Ulugbek, 83, Tashkent 100125, Uzbekistan.
Désirée GülNanobiomedicine/Molecular and Cellular Oncology, ENT, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2446-5756
Mustafa DolazDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, Bishkek 720038, Kyrgyzstan.
Burcu Önal AcetDepartment of Engineering Fundamental Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Artvin Çoruh University, Artvin 08000, Türkiye.
Leyla Polat KöseDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Vocational School, İstanbul Beykent University, Istanbul 34500, Türkiye.
Mehmet OdabaşıFaculty of Arts and Science, Chemistry Department, Aksaray University, Aksaray 68100, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-2589-9919
Roland H StauberNanobiomedicine/Molecular and Cellular Oncology, ENT, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
Ömür AcetVocational School of Health Science, Pharmacy Services Program, Tarsus University, Tarsus 33400, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer progression and therapeutic resistance are closely associated with disrupted redox homeostasis, in which oxidative stress drives tumor growth, metabolic adaptation, and treatment failure. Although antioxidants have traditionally been considered cytoprotective agents, their effects on tumor redox signaling are highly context-dependent, creating an antioxidant paradox that limits their therapeutic application. This review examines how dysregulated redox signaling shapes breast cancer biology and therapeutic response across ER+, HER2+, and triple-negative subtypes, with emphasis on the NRF2-KEAP1, p53, PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and HIF-1α pathways. These mechanisms provide a biological rationale for selectively modulating tumor redox states rather than broadly suppressing oxidative stress. Within this framework, redox-responsive nanocarriers and nanozymes offer opportunities for precise spatial and temporal redox modulation, enhanced tumor targeting, and controlled therapeutic activity while potentially minimizing effects on healthy tissues. Redox-directed nanotherapeutics may also influence the tumor immune microenvironment, angiogenesis, and metabolic rewiring. However, clinical translation remains constrained by dose- and context-dependent effects, intratumoral heterogeneity, limited biomarker validation, and inadequate predictive models. Personalized redox nanomedicine integrating subtype-specific redox profiling, smart nanotherapeutic platforms, and biomarker-guided patient stratification could establish redox modulation as a precision therapeutic axis and improve treatment outcomes in breast cancer.

Indexed as

antioxidant therapybreast canceroxidative stressredox homeostasistherapeutic redox modulation

Identifiers

PMID42939881
PMCPMC13701286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.