ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
N-Acetylcysteine in Schizophrenia: A Convergent Redox-Based Approach to Therapeutic Potential.
Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schizophrenia (SCZ) remains one of the most disabling psychiatric disorders, in large part because current antipsychotics (APs) inadequately address negative symptoms and cognitive deficits. Converging evidence implicates a set of interconnected mechanisms, NMDAR hypofunction, oxidative stress, and a possible low-grade neuroimmune activation, that converge on parvalbumin-positive GABAergic interneuron dysfunction, the likely substrate of these refractory symptom domains. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is an adjunctive candidate because it may act on several of these pathways: it replenishes glutathione (GSH), restores redox balance, and modulates glutamatergic transmission, while its immunomodulatory effects remain poorly characterized in SCZ. This comprehensive review synthesizes evidence from preclinical models and clinical trials, showing that NAC produces replicated but modest benefits for negative symptoms and cognitive function, with inconsistent effects on positive symptoms. Notably, null findings in clinical-high-risk and treatment-resistant populations, together with a single exploratory subgroup analysis in early psychosis in which a peripheral redox index (erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase activity) was associated with positive-symptom response, raise the hypothesis that NAC efficacy may depend on a pre-existing, measurable antioxidant deficit. Adequately powered, biomarker-enriched trials that stratify patients by redox status are therefore needed to determine whether NAC is an effective targeted therapy for a mechanistically defined SCZ subgroup. Such trials would resolve whether the modest effect sizes observed in unselected populations reflect true but limited efficacy or dilution by enrolment of redox-normal patients unlikely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.