ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Thermotherapy for Chronic Wounds: A Wound-Interface Translation Framework for Materials, Devices, Clinical Evidence, and Validation Requirements.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest in local warming for chronic wound care has re-emerged as flexible heaters, embedded sensors, and smart dressings make controlled heat delivery increasingly feasible. This narrative translational review treats thermotherapy as a dose-dependent wound-interface intervention rather than a single warming technology. It distinguishes normothermic radiant warming, water-filtered infrared A, resistive Joule heating, photothermal systems, and temperature-monitoring technologies by mechanism, thermal context, therapeutic purpose, and evidence level. The review integrates wound pathophysiology, biological responses to temperature, thermal-dose concepts, emerging heater platforms, sensing and closed-loop control, clinical evidence, safety, and regulatory translation. Direct human treatment evidence remains concentrated in small historical radiant-warming and water-filtered infrared A studies, with limited additional local-heat evidence, and cannot be transferred directly to contemporary flexible, wireless, or photothermal platforms. For lower-temperature warming, heater setpoint alone is an inadequate dose descriptor, and the biological meaning of cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43) has not been validated; measured time-temperature profiles, peak temperature, spatial variation, sensor location, and uncertainty are more informative. Clinical translation therefore depends on reproducible wound-interface dosing under realistic moisture, pressure, perfusion, dressing, motion, and workflow conditions, together with wound-specific dose models, transparent reporting, realistic interface validation, and architecture-specific regulatory evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.