ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Well-Being Measurement in Africa: A Systematic Review.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The general narrative in well-being measurement is a lack of representation of instruments developed and validated in the African context. However, there is no existing review solely focused on Africa that clearly demonstrates the extent of progress in the field and the current methodological challenges. The present study aims to systematically review and collate evidence on the validation of well-being measures in Africa. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, a total of 64 research articles were reviewed. The study's findings showed steady growth in well-being measurement in the African context. However, this growth has not been without challenges that are stifling our general understanding and consensus on how well-being should be measured in Africa. A persistent research gap is the development of new, contextually relevant measures of well-being. Among the recurring methodological challenges were translation issues, poor model fit indices and the use of small samples. We recommend further testing of locally developed well-being measures and their incorporation into international surveys, as cross-country assessments can only yield meaningful insights when the items used adequately capture local experiences. Translation of existing measures is key in accessing hard-to-reach populations, with such data informing clinical and community-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.