ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence in Acute Coronary Syndromes: From Early Diagnosis to Culprit Lesion Characterization, Coronary Physiology, and Risk Stratification.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is being investigated across the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care pathway, including early diagnosis, coronary lesion characterization, procedural guidance, and risk prediction. This comprehensive review examines the current evidence across the entire ACS trajectory, with particular emphasis on clinically actionable and interventional applications. AI-enabled electrocardiography (ECG) may improve detection of myocardial infarction, including occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) that does not meet conventional STEMI criteria. Models combining clinical data and high-sensitivity troponin may improve early rule-out and rule-in. In coronary imaging, AI can quantify plaque characteristics and assist with the interpretation of OCT and IVUS, while image-derived physiology may help assess non-culprit lesions. However, better diagnostic accuracy does not necessarily translate into better revascularization decisions. AI-based models can also estimate post-ACS ischemic, bleeding, and mortality risk, although evidence that their use improves treatment or outcomes remains limited. The next priority is prospective evaluation of whether these tools improve decisions, workflow, and patient outcomes across diverse clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.