ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Vascular Phenotyping Across the CKM Syndrome: Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function Testing, Prognostic Value and Clinical Implementation.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a continuum of metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular abnormalities in which vascular dysfunction may develop before clinically overt cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, microvascular abnormalities, and structural vascular damage may therefore provide complementary information regarding vascular injury across CKM stages. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the pathophysiological basis, non-invasive assessment, prognostic value, and clinical implementation of vascular phenotyping across the CKM spectrum, with particular emphasis on arterial stiffness and endothelial function. The principal approaches discussed include carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), peripheral arterial tonometry, microvascular techniques, and structural markers such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) and carotid plaque, considered in the context of contemporary CKM staging and PREVENT-based risk assessment. Among functional vascular measures, cfPWV remains the best-validated non-invasive marker of aortic stiffness and is independently associated with cardiovascular and renal outcomes, whereas FMD provides complementary information on conduit-artery endothelial function but is limited by technical requirements and inconsistent incremental predictive value. Microvascular and glycocalyx-based techniques remain less standardized, while structural phenotyping, particularly CAC and carotid plaque assessment, has stronger evidence for risk reclassification in selected populations. Vascular phenotyping should therefore be regarded as a selective, risk-adapted strategy rather than a universal screening approach. Its greatest potential may lie in integrating vascular measures with CKM stage, PREVENT estimates, kidney and cardiac biomarkers, and structural imaging to identify disproportionate or subclinical vascular injury, particularly during progression from CKM stage 2 to stage 3. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether such multimodal phenotyping improves therapeutic decision-making and cardiovascular and kidney outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.