ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Mitochondrial quality control at the ferroptosis-pyroptosis interface in diabetic cardiomyopathy: a narrative critical synthesis.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic cardiomyopathy is clinically heterogeneous, whereas much of its mechanistic literature relies on experimental models. This narrative critical synthesis examines whether mitochondrial quality control links diabetic stress to ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and multicellular remodeling. The evidence base is an author-selected set of 112 publications mapped from a 400-record collection, supplemented by methodological and clinical context. Original database-specific search histories were not retained in the available materials. PubMed Central full text was available for 66 corpus records; 46 were initially accessible only as abstracts. A focused full-text reassessment of selected original reports replaces the earlier corpus-wide support labels. We distinguish core quality-control processes from associated metabolic regulators and separate death markers from functional evidence of execution. The best-supported findings concern model-specific changes in mitochondrial function, lipid-peroxide-sensitive injury, and intercellular communication. They do not establish a universal mitochondrial quality-control hierarchy or same-cell ferroptosis-pyroptosis co-execution. No single study identified in the available evidence demonstrates all three transitions from markers to execution, from one death program to another, and from rodents to a corresponding human mechanism. We compare same-cell coupling with cross-cell propagation and specify experiments that would distinguish them. Human phenotype and prognosis associations support disease relevance but cannot establish myocardial death mechanisms or therapeutic mediation. The resulting framework treats mitochondrial quality control as interacting, separable processes that may alter susceptibility to particular death programs, rather than as an established master regulator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.