ArticlePloS one2026
Recovery experiences and perceptions of quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: An interpretive descriptive qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of mortality globally, with a disproportionate burden in low- and middle-income countries. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the standard treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction, a life-threatening acute coronary syndrome requiring urgent revascularization. Despite increasing access to this intervention in sub-Saharan Africa, evidence on patients' lived experiences of recovery remains limited. This study explored patients' experiences of recovery and quality of life following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Tanzania.
methodsAn interpretive descriptive qualitative design was employed. Fourteen patients who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction were purposively sampled at a national referral cardiac centre and interviewed within three months after PCI. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsParticipants perceived quality of life after PCI as an evolving experience closely linked to their recovery, with improvements in one aspect often accompanied by ongoing challenges in others. Six interrelated themes emerged: physical symptoms, functional capacity and daily activities, emotional responses, coping and illness perceptions, social support and relationships, and health system interactions and communication. Although participants generally reported symptom improvement and gradual functional recovery, persistent fatigue, activity limitations, emotional uncertainty, and unmet informational needs continued to influence their quality of life. Family support and adaptive coping helped participants adjust to life after PCI, while healthcare communication shaped their confidence in managing recovery.
conclusionRecovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention extends beyond survival to include physical, emotional, and social dimensions. Holistic, patient-centred post-intervention care is needed to support long-term recovery in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.