ReviewPediatric reports2026
Parental Feeding Practices, Child Eating Behaviours, and Their Association with Metabolic Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Pediatric reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesFamily-related factors are central to type 1 diabetes (T1D) management during childhood and adolescence. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on the associations between parental feeding practices, child eating and mealtime behaviours, and glycaemic, nutritional and other diabetes-related outcomes in children and adolescents with T1D.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261291514). PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched without publication date restrictions. Observational studies including children and adolescents aged 0-18 years with T1D and examining parental feeding practices or child eating/mealtime behaviours in relation to diabetes-related outcomes were eligible. Family mealtime functioning was considered as a secondary construct when examined within otherwise eligible feeding- or mealtime-focused studies. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Owing to substantial heterogeneity in study populations, constructs, assessment instruments and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively.
resultsEleven reports representing nine unique studies were included. Most studies were cross-sectional and involved predominantly preschool and younger school-aged children, with limited representation of adolescents. Associations between feeding and mealtime-related factors and diabetes-related outcomes varied across studies and constructs. Greater child mealtime problems and specific disruptive mealtime behaviours were associated with higher HbA1c or less favourable glucose-related measures in some analyses, while aspects of family mealtime functioning were associated with dietary adherence or glucose measurements outside the target range. Parental feeding practices, including restriction and pressure to eat, showed inconsistent or null associations with glycaemic outcomes. Associations were also reported with diet quality, carbohydrate intake and mealtime behaviours, although effect direction and magnitude varied, and null findings were common. Evidence from continuous glucose monitoring-derived outcomes was limited.
conclusionsParental feeding practices and child mealtime behaviours may be associated with glycaemic, dietary and behavioural outcomes in paediatric T1D, while family mealtime functioning emerged as a relevant secondary contextual construct. However, the available evidence is heterogeneous and predominantly cross-sectional. These constructs should not be considered interchangeable dimensions of parental control, and current evidence does not establish directionality or causality, nor demonstrate that modifying feeding or mealtime practices improves glycaemic outcomes. Further longitudinal and intervention studies using clearly defined constructs, developmentally diverse samples, and objective glycaemic measures are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.