ReviewJournal of eye movement research2026
Through the Looking Glass: Eye Tracking as a Cognitive Benchmark for Language-Model Semantics and Observer-Specific Semantic Alignment.
Review in Journal of eye movement research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing semantic representations learned by language models remains challenging because conventional intrinsic benchmarks capture limited aspects of meaning and often correlate weakly with downstream performance. Eye tracking offers complementary, cognitively grounded evidence: gaze measures recorded during reading and scene viewing index online processing and attentional selection, although they should not be treated as readouts of semantic representations. This narrative review and methodological framework synthesizes research linking distributional and contextual language representations to eye-movement behavior, focusing on semantic relatedness, predictability, surprisal, model scale, layer-dependent alignment, and model-human correspondence. Evidence from naturalistic reading corpora shows that embedding-derived relatedness and language-model surprisal explain variance in fixation measures, while recent work demonstrates that cognitive alignment depends on model size, layer, tokenization, task, and measurement regime. We propose extending this approach from population-level model evaluation to observer-specific gaze-derived relational structure. For visual scenes, gaze transitions can be represented as candidate choices and relational graphs and compared with multiple semantic-relation matrices derived from language or vision-language models. Because gaze transitions are influenced by spatial distance, object size, salience, task demands, context, and preprocessing decisions, these factors must be controlled and, where causal isolation is intended, manipulated independently of semantic relations. We propose combining candidate-normalized hierarchical choice models, residualized gaze relations, representational similarity analysis with reliability and uncertainty assessment, and required independent behavioral validation to characterize convergence and divergence between model semantic geometry and observer-specific relational organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.