ArticleJournal of imaging2026
DWFAU-Net: A Clinically-Guided Dual-Window Fusion Attention U-Net for Coronary Artery Segmentation in CT Angiography.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery segmentation in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is challenging because the vessels are small, low in contrast and anatomically variable. We propose a Dual-Window Fusion Attention U-Net (DWFAU-Net) in which two Hounsfield Unit windows, selected on validation patients, are processed by parallel encoders, fused by learnable 1 × 1 convolutions and decoded by a shared attention-gated decoder. Each window input combines the normalized CT image with a Frangi vesselness map and a Gaussian-smoothed image, and training uses a topology-aware BCE, Soft-Dice and clDice loss. On 16 Rotterdam volumes, under a patient-level protocol and without a region of interest, centerline or seed points, DWFAU-Net achieved a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.691 and an IoU of 0.580 on unseen patients, with a stable DSC of 0.697 ± 0.012 over five trainings. In five-fold patient-level cross-validation, it achieved the highest slice DSC in folds 1-4 and the lowest mean 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance (30.55 pixels), with overall overlap statistically comparable to single-window and concatenation models. Ablations showed a consistent gain from the Frangi channel (volumetric Dice 0.712 vs. 0.684) and identified a clDice weight of 0.5 as the best of the tested weights, preserving patient-level overlap. The model was robust to ±50 HU contrast-enhancement shifts (DSC change ≤ 0.040) and segmented a patient in 0.31 s. A slice-level split gave a DSC of 0.870, showing how strongly the data-splitting protocol affects reported accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.