ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Detection in Colorectal Cancer (CRC): Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major contributor to colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence following curative-intent treatment, yet conventional surveillance methods may fail to detect residual disease at its earliest stages. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive biomarker for MRD detection and postoperative monitoring. We conducted a structured PubMed-based literature review and included 94 publications evaluating ctDNA in CRC. Across the literature, postoperative ctDNA positivity was consistently associated with increased recurrence risk and poorer disease-free and overall survival, while serial monitoring improved detection sensitivity and enabled assessment of treatment response. ctDNA frequently identified molecular recurrence approximately 2.5-11.5 months before conventional surveillance. Both tumor-informed and tumor-naive strategies were represented, using PCR/ddPCR, targeted next-generation sequencing, whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, methylation-based assays, and emerging multiomic approaches. Although ctDNA demonstrates strong prognostic value, evidence supporting treatment modification based solely on ctDNA status remains limited. Further prospective randomized trials, assay standardization, and consensus clinical guidelines are required before routine implementation. Overall, ctDNA is a promising tool for recurrence prediction, surveillance, and precision management of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.