Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42930172›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Detection in Colorectal Cancer (CRC): Current Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions.

Hannah Hyde, Emma Mageau, Chelsea M Leduc, Mitul J Madhu, Noah Dickinson, Tafheem-Un Nisa, Karolina M Czajka, Stacey A Santi, Prashant Jani, Grace W Ma and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hannah HydeMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-3983-6844
Emma MageauMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Chelsea M LeducMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Mitul J MadhuMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Noah DickinsonMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Tafheem-Un NisaMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Karolina M CzajkaMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Stacey A SantiMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.
Prashant JaniHealth Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, ON P3E 2H2, Canada.
Grace W MaHealth Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, ON P3E 2H2, Canada.
Sujeenthar TharmalingamMedical Sciences Division, NOSM University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-0415-4831

Funding

Health Sciences North Foundation 2025Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Associate - Clinical Innovation Opportunities Fund A-25-06Northern Ontario School of Medicine University Faculty Association Research Development Award 2026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major contributor to colorectal cancer (CRC) recurrence following curative-intent treatment, yet conventional surveillance methods may fail to detect residual disease at its earliest stages. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive biomarker for MRD detection and postoperative monitoring. We conducted a structured PubMed-based literature review and included 94 publications evaluating ctDNA in CRC. Across the literature, postoperative ctDNA positivity was consistently associated with increased recurrence risk and poorer disease-free and overall survival, while serial monitoring improved detection sensitivity and enabled assessment of treatment response. ctDNA frequently identified molecular recurrence approximately 2.5-11.5 months before conventional surveillance. Both tumor-informed and tumor-naive strategies were represented, using PCR/ddPCR, targeted next-generation sequencing, whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, methylation-based assays, and emerging multiomic approaches. Although ctDNA demonstrates strong prognostic value, evidence supporting treatment modification based solely on ctDNA status remains limited. Further prospective randomized trials, assay standardization, and consensus clinical guidelines are required before routine implementation. Overall, ctDNA is a promising tool for recurrence prediction, surveillance, and precision management of CRC.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm, ResidualBiomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAcirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA)colon cancercolorectal cancer (CRC)disease surveillanceliquid biopsyminimal residual disease (MRD)precision oncologyrectal cancerrecurrence predictiontumor-informed assays

Identifiers

PMID42930172
PMCPMC13703757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.