Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42930014›Full record

ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Real-World Pharmacological Patterns and Residual Cardiometabolic Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Romania.

Bianca-Lăcrimioara Petca, Paula-Alexandra Popovici, Andreea Diana Igna, Timea Claudia Ghitea, Mihaela Simona Popoviciu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bianca-Lăcrimioara PetcaDoctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 1 University Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Paula-Alexandra PopoviciDoctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 1 University Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Andreea Diana IgnaDoctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 1 University Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Timea Claudia GhiteaPharmacy Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 University Street, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8981-1958
Mihaela Simona PopoviciuDepartment of Preclinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410028 Oradea, Romania.

Funding

University of Oradea 410087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContemporary management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has shifted from a glucose-centered approach toward integrated cardio-renal-metabolic protection. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and intensive lipid-lowering therapies have demonstrated substantial cardiovascular and renal benefits, implementation in routine outpatient care and the burden of persistent residual risk remain insufficiently characterized in Romania.

objectivesWe aimed to evaluate routine-care pharmacological treatment patterns, identify residual cardio-renal-metabolic risk despite ongoing therapy, determine independent correlates of persistent adverse outcomes, and explore potential therapeutic gaps in adults with T2DM.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study included 232 unique adults with T2DM attending a specialized outpatient diabetes clinic in Romania between 1 October 2024 and 19 February 2026. One eligible outpatient record per participant was analyzed; when multiple records were available, the earliest eligible record in the exported dataset was used as the index visit. No a priori sample-size calculation was performed. Pharmacological therapies, cardiovascular and renal phenotypes, metabolic biomarkers, and clinical outcomes were extracted from routinely collected electronic medical records. Residual risk was evaluated using glycemic, lipid, renal, obesity, and blood-pressure targets. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified independent correlates of persistent cardio-metabolic abnormalities. An exploratory cumulative residual-risk count was constructed by summing seven clinically relevant uncontrolled risk factors.

resultsBiguanides were the most frequently prescribed glucose-lowering agents (53.0%), followed by SGLT2 inhibitors (44.8%), insulin (32.3% of the total cohort), GLP-1 receptor agonists (15.5%), and DPP-4 inhibitors (14.7%). Statins were prescribed to 48.7% of participants. SGLT2 inhibitor use did not differ significantly according to established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease phenotypes, whereas GLP-1 receptor agonists were prescribed more frequently in participants with obesity (22.0% vs. 7.6%,

conclusionsSignificant residual cardio-renal-metabolic risk persists in adults with T2DM despite use of contemporary pharmacological therapies. Disease severity markers and treatment exposure were associated with persistent adverse outcomes, but the cross-sectional design does not establish causality. The study identified potentially modifiable therapeutic gaps among patients with established cardiovascular and renal disease. Comprehensive and repeatedly reassessed cardio-renal-metabolic management, integrating pharmacological optimization with individualized risk stratification, may improve implementation of guideline-directed therapy and reduce long-term complications in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

cardio-renal–metabolic syndromeGLP-1 receptor agonistspharmacological treatment patternsreal-world evidenceresidual cardiovascular riskresidual renal riskSGLT2 inhibitorsstatin therapytherapeutic gapstype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID42930014
PMCPMC13702964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.