ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advanced Therapies for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Critical Review of Gene-, RNA-, and Cell-Based Strategies to Address Residual Risk.
Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic kidney disease (DKD) can progress despite contemporary kidney-protective treatment, motivating the development of additional mechanism-based interventions. This critical narrative review evaluates whether gene-, RNA-, and cell-based strategies are ready to address this residual risk and identifies the evidence required for clinical translation.
methodsA targeted literature verification and update was undertaken for the revision, with emphasis on primary intervention studies, contradictory findings, and the distinction between target validation and product efficacy. Mechanistic and model system background is considered in relation to therapeutic selection.
resultsAdeno-associated viral vectors offer potentially durable expression but face species-dependent renal tropism, immunity, and limited control after administration. RNA therapeutics permit time-limited modulation, although productive renal delivery and compartment-specific effects remain unresolved. Mesenchymal stromal cells and extracellular vesicles provide broader paracrine activity, with challenges in potency definition, biodistribution, and manufacturing. Autologous renal cell products have entered clinical testing but require individualized production and invasive delivery. Most gene and RNA evidence is preclinical; cell therapy trials provide feasibility or exploratory efficacy signals rather than definitive kidney protection.
conclusionsThus, at present, progress toward routine DKD use requires reproducible renal target engagement, validated manufacturing, and confirmation of clinical benefit in randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.