ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026
Traditional Chinese Medicine for Diabetic Kidney Disease: Predominantly Preclinical Evidence, Mechanistic Pathways, and Translational Challenges.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a type of kidney microvascular complication resulting from diabetes, and it is one of the leading causes of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Existing drugs improve kidney function but do not markedly delay progression to ESKD or reduce mortality, so complementary approaches are urgently needed. This paper summarizes the evidence for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in DKD, organized by pathological mechanism. The studies identified here were almost exclusively preclinical, based on rodent models of DKD and on kidney cells exposed to high glucose. Across these studies, TCM interventions improved kidney function indices and attenuated glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury. The evidence is unevenly developed and was graded accordingly. Attenuation of oxidative stress, inflammation and kidney fibrosis is the best supported, whereas the modulation of autophagy, ferroptosis and the gut microbiota rests on a smaller number of studies. Podocyte injury, pyroptosis, apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction are each supported by only a few reports, and all of these mechanisms remain exploratory. Reported effects included restored antioxidant enzyme activity, reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine production, suppressed profibrotic signaling, increased levels of autophagy-related proteins, preserved glutathione peroxidase 4, reduced abundance of uremic toxin-producing gut taxa and preserved podocyte markers. Only a few agents have entered controlled trials, and some support comes from population-based cohorts, which report lower risks of ESKD and all-cause mortality among TCM users. Because reported outcomes are largely surrogate endpoints, TCM may currently be positioned only as a complementary or adjunctive therapy, pending confirmation in large multicenter randomized trials with hard kidney outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.