ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Heart failure with supranormal ejection fraction: is it the new Ariadne's string?
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with supranormal ejection fraction (HFsnEF) is an emerging and incompletely characterized phenotype within the heart failure (HF) spectrum. Although no universally accepted LVEF threshold for HFsnEF has been established and different definitions have been used across published studies, for the purposes of this review HFsnEF is operationally defined as HF with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 65%. Importantly, a supranormal LVEF should not be interpreted as evidence of enhanced ventricular performance. Patients with HFsnEF may exhibit smaller left ventricular (LV) volumes, concentric remodeling, increased myocardial stiffness, impaired longitudinal deformation, reduced stroke volume and preload reserve, and elevated filling pressures, particularly during exercise. HFsnEF is unlikely to represent a single disease entity; rather, it encompasses heterogeneous pathophysiological substrates and clinical phenotypes, including hypertensive and cardiometabolic remodeling, valvular heart disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM), and other conditions associated with hyperdynamic ventricular function. Accordingly, the diagnostic evaluation should extend beyond recognition of an elevated LVEF and systematically identify the underlying phenotype and potentially treatable causes through comprehensive echocardiography, myocardial deformation imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance, disease-specific testing, and exercise or invasive hemodynamic assessment when indicated. Therapeutic evidence specific to HFsnEF remains limited. No randomized clinical trial has specifically evaluated conventional HF pharmacotherapy in a population prospectively defined by LVEF > 65%; therefore, evidence for conventional HF and cardiometabolic therapies is derived predominantly from broader HFpEF populations or subgroup analyses and should be regarded as indirect rather than definitive evidence for HFsnEF. In contrast, recognition of specific underlying diseases, particularly ATTR-CM, HCM, and significant valvular heart disease, may permit evidence-based disease-specific treatment. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical phenotypes of HFsnEF and proposes a practical phenotype-guided approach to diagnosis and management. Standardized definitions and prospective trials specifically addressing patients with LVEF > 65% are needed to establish evidence-based therapeutic strategies for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42928386What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.