ReviewAsian journal of pharmaceutical sciences2026
Spatiotemporal control of protein degradation: Advances in stimuli-responsive nano-PROTACs for precision cancer therapy.
Review in Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have shown great promise in recent years as a new class of drugs capable of targeting and degrading difficult-to-treat proteins. However, the clinical translation of PROTACs is hindered by their unfavorable physicochemical characteristics (e.g., high molecular weight, poor solubility) and the potential for systemic off-target toxicity due to the widespread expression of E3 ligases. To address these issues, stimuli-responsive nano-PROTACs have been developed to enable spatiotemporal control over PROTAC activation. This review critically discusses the development of nano-PROTACs and summarizes different design strategies, including early passive encapsulation and more advanced stimuli-responsive nanostructures activated by endogenous signals (e.g., pH, enzymes and redox conditions) and exogenous signals (e.g., light and ultrasound). The emerging trend of dual-response "Logic Gate" systems and carrier-free poly-PROTAC paradigms is also presented. The review also discusses the combination of nano-PROTACs with other therapeutic strategies to maximize therapeutic efficacy and minimize drug resistance, a critical aspect for clinical applications. Finally, future prospects for nano-PROTACs are introduced, with the expectation that research in this field will continue to progress. Based on the above analysis of these technological developments, the remaining challenges and possible countermeasures for achieving precise protein degradation in clinical practice can be identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.