Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42921641›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging2026

Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Transforming Diagnosis, Prognostication, and Workflow.

Tamaghna Ghosh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of radiology & imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tamaghna GhoshQure.aiKolkataWest BengalIndia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping neuroimaging across the entirety of the clinical workflow, encompassing patient scheduling, scan quality assurance, image acquisition and reconstruction, automated lesion detection, pathological characterization, treatment planning, and outcome prognostication. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence through a workflow-centric framework, with particular emphasis on AI tools that have achieved real-world clinical implementation. Although reported technical performance across these domains is frequently compelling, critical deficiencies persist in external validation, human-AI benchmarking, model calibration, and standardized performance reporting, collectively impeding full clinical integration. Emerging evidence suggests that the role of the neuroradiologist is transitioning toward a collaborative human-AI paradigm, rather than one of displacement.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical translationdeep learningneuroimaging workflowneuroradiology

Identifiers

PMID42921641
PMCPMC13694174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.