Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42920748›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Preclinical evaluation of a safety-aware multimodal robotic pipeline for human-robot interaction in post-stroke rehabilitation.

Bruna Maria Vittoria Guerra, Roberto Soldi, Francesco Lunghi, Stefania Sozzi, Leo Russo, Micaela Schmid, Stefano Ramat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bruna Maria Vittoria GuerraBioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Roberto SoldiBioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Francesco LunghiBioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Stefania SozziBioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Leo RussoBioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Micaela SchmidBioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Stefano RamatBioengineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Post-stroke rehabilitation increasingly requires technologies capable of supporting intensive, measurable, and adaptable interventions while preserving clinical supervision and patient safety. This study presents a lightweight, safety-aware, and modular multimodal robotic pipeline for embodied human-robot interaction in post-stroke rehabilitation, with a first target application in hemispatial inattention. Methods: The system was implemented on the TIAGo mobile manipulator within a ROS 2-based architecture and integrates therapist-mediated supervision, speech-based and graphical interaction, head-orientation monitoring, adaptive auditory recall, robot-mediated and screen-based task delivery, and structured performance logging. Dialogue management is based on a deterministic finite-state machine coupled with a rule-based Natural Language Understanding pipeline, enabling predictable interaction handling, explicit fallback behavior, and therapist escalation for safety-relevant events. A preliminary preclinical evaluation was conducted in 16 healthy participants, with a repeated acquisition after 1 month. The study assessed operational feasibility, multimodal interaction robustness, head-orientation monitoring stability, task execution, ASR-related interaction events, usability, acceptance, and 1-month reproducibility of workflow execution. Results: All participants completed both acquisitions without adverse events or safety-relevant events requiring interruption of the experimental workflow. End-effector recognition accuracy remained high, attention-recall events were infrequent, screen-based visual tasks were successfully administered and logged, and usability and acceptance outcomes were favorable, with low anxiety toward the robotic platform. Discussion: These findings support the feasibility of using a therapist-supervised robotic platform as an integrated tool for structured interaction, head-orientation monitoring, rehabilitation-oriented task delivery, and quantitative logging. The study presents a preclinical evaluation of system architecture, safety-aware interaction design, and workflow robustness. Future work is organized in two stages: a dedicated acceptance and robustness protocol in healthy controls to formally test interaction acceptance, speech-recognition robustness, and safety-relevant failure handling, followed by a true rehabilitation protocol in post-stroke patients with hemispatial inattention, including therapist-supervised exercise adaptation.

Indexed as

attentional monitoringfinite-state machinehemispatial inattentionhuman–robot interactionmultimodal interactionpost-stroke rehabilitationrehabilitation robotics

Identifiers

PMID42920748
PMCPMC13690936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.