ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases2026
A less invasive alternative to fenestration for selected localized postoperative empyema with persistent air leak: prolonged open drainage using a large-sized cut tube in two patients.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative empyema with persistent air leak remains a challenging complication after pulmonary resection. Fenestration may be required in refractory cases but is highly invasive, particularly in high-risk patients. We report two patients successfully treated with prolonged open drainage using a large-sized cut tube without fenestration and propose clinical criteria for selecting suitable candidates. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis developed Aspergillus empyema with persistent air leak after bullectomy for pneumothorax, and a 71-year-old man developed empyema with persistent air leak after left lower lobectomy and lingulectomy with bronchoplasty for lung cancer. Both were initially treated with closed chest drainage and antimicrobial therapy. On days 23 and 32, respectively, after infection was controlled, drainage volume decreased to < 50 mL/day, the empyema cavity became localized, and residual lung expansion remained stable despite persistent air leakage, the drainage tubes were cut and shortened to convert them to open drainage. CT confirmed that both cavities were anatomically separated from the pulmonary artery and other major hilar vessels. Both patients were subsequently managed as outpatients, and the empyema cavities gradually became obliterated by granulation tissue, allowing tube removal without fenestration. No recurrence occurred during 2 and 4 years of follow-up, respectively.
conclusionsProlonged open drainage with a large-sized cut tube may provide a less invasive alternative to fenestration in selected patients with postoperative empyema and persistent air leak. Suitable candidates may be characterized by controlled infection, low drainage volume, a localized empyema cavity, stable residual lung expansion, and anatomical separation from major hilar vessels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.