ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2026
Ischemic stroke: molecular mechanisms of blood-brain barrier dysfunction and opportunities for drug development.
Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of disability and death, yet decades of therapeutic development have yielded remarkably little clinical progress. The limited progress in improving stroke outcomes is closely linked to dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which undergoes profound structural and functional disruption during ischemic injury. Barrier injury under ischemic conditions is driven, in part, by glutamate dysregulation, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress, which act in concert to destabilize endothelial integrity and exacerbate BBB permeability. Targeting these interconnected mechanisms represents a promising approach to preserve BBB function and limit secondary injury following stroke. Interventions aimed at modulating excitotoxic signaling, inflammatory cascades, and redox imbalance can protect the BBB and the larger neurovascular unit (NVU); however, aging further compromises BBB integrity and resilience, compounding these pathological processes and posing additional challenges for therapeutic development, particularly given the higher incidence of stroke in older individuals. This review highlights current understanding of BBB physiology in health and under ischemic conditions with an emphasis on how excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress compromise BBB functional integrity. Additionally, we evaluate therapeutic strategies aimed at preserving or restoring BBB homeostasis. By integrating insights into BBB biology with advances in neurovascular therapeutics, this review provides a forward-thinking assessment on the future of therapeutic development for ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.