ReviewParasites & vectors2026
Building resilience against the growing threat of arboviruses II: a scoping review of Aedes vector competence, larval and adult bionomics and species distribution in Africa.
Review in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReports of arboviral outbreaks are increasing, yet there are acknowledged shortfalls in surveillance data and outbreak preparedness on the African continent. The second part of this scoping review features Aedes vector-pathogen interactions, bionomics and species distribution.
methodsWe reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2023 to synthesize existing information and identify knowledge gaps to guide future Aedes research and control in Africa.
results877 full-text articles were reviewed, 70 featured vector-pathogen interactions, 230 vector bionomics and 394 species distribution. Vector competence studies were limited to a handful of countries, highlighting knowledge gaps regarding urban, bridge and sylvatic vector species competence for major arboviruses. Aedes albopictus was highly competent for chikungunya virus with the E1-226V mutation, which has been implicated in epidemics where Ae. aegypti was displaced. Vector competence was dependent on virus lineage and mosquito population. Ae. aegypti competence to dengue virus was highly variable, whereas Ae. albopictus was an efficient vector of Zika virus for African but not Asian lineages. Discarded tires were the most frequently reported positive breeding habitats, ranking among the top three in 55% of publications, followed by other discarded items (cans, bottles, broken plastic items) and water storage containers; however, the relative importance varied by location. The pupal index was reported less frequently than traditional indices (container, Breteau and house indices), which co-occurred in 84% of studies reporting indices. As pupal counts are a better proxy for adult mosquito production, their wider use is recommended to identify locally important breeding sites for targeted control. Adult vector monitoring has shifted away from human landing catch towards BG-Sentinel and CDC-LT traps which may be less accurate proxies of human-vector contact, but efficiency can be improved using attractants. Ae. aegypti was highly anthropophilic and had a major biting peak before sunset. However, findings of Ae. aegypti biting at night-time and being zoophilic in some locations demonstrate the need for periodic monitoring, given changing environmental conditions.
conclusionsThis review highlights how Aedes populations vary in their competence for key arboviruses, their breeding habitats, and biting behaviors across Africa. Understanding these patterns can guide targeted vector control and improve preparedness for arbovirus outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920176What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.