ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Functional performance tests in male and female professional dancers from four classical ballet companies - a cohort study.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFunctional performance test (FPT) results have rarely been analysed for sex-specific differences among professional ballet dancers yet. Therefore, this study aims to assess the FPT results of professional female and male ballet dancers, analyse sex-specific differences, describe the number of dancers meeting predefined thresholds, and present the prevalence of lower limb asymmetries in selected FPTs.
methodsProfessional ballet companies in Germany were invited to participate in this study via word-of-mouth. An extensive health & performance screening was provided to the voluntarily participating dancers, which included eight FPTs. Solely dancers on sick leave were excluded. The selected FPTs focused on stability (balance error scoring system (BESS)), muscular endurance & strength (heel-rise test, Bunkie test, and closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test (CKCUEST)), and hop performance (vertical-hop test, figure-of-eight-hop test, side-hop test, and speedy jump test). Differences in the FPT results between sexes, limb asymmetries in the FPTs (determined by the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI)), and the number of dancers achieving predefined thresholds were analysed with independent-samples t-test, and Chi²-tests, respectively.
resultsData from 115 dancers from four classical ballet companies were included in the analysis. The FPT results differed between sexes: while female dancers performed better than male dancers in the heel-rise test (p = .019), males excelled in the CKCUEST (p<.001), Bunkie Copenhagen plank (p = .004), vertical-hop test (p<.001), figure-of-eight-hop test (p<.001), and side-hop test (p<.001). Lower limb asymmetries greater than 15% were most prevalent in the vertical-hop test (30%) and the side-hop test (24%), and least prevalent in the figure-of-eight-hop test (1%).
conclusionThis is the first study that analysed sex-specific differences in FPT results of professional ballet dancers from multiple companies. It contributes to the broader understanding of the basic physical performance skills for ballet, presenting the current training status of dancers from four professional ballet companies. The majority of muscular endurance & strength tests and hop performance tests revealed significant differences between male and female dancers, with many dancers showing notable limb asymmetries. Overall, the results demonstrated a lower performance level compared to athletes in other sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.