Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42920141›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026

Infrequent exposure to prehospital neonatal interventions and resource utilisation by a public EMS in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Kayleigh Bernardo, Naseef Abdullah, Saarah Davids, Simpiwe Sobuwa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kayleigh BernardoDepartment of Emergency Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa. bernardok@cput.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7896-6693
Naseef AbdullahEmergency Medical Services, Western Cape Government Health & Wellness, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2749-8397
Saarah DavidsSAMRC/CPUT Cardiometabolic Health Research Unit, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-7327
Simpiwe SobuwaDepartment of Emergency Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Wellness Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8652-7756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neonatal period is the most vulnerable time of every child's life, with approximately 6,300 neonatal deaths occurring globally every day. Emergency medical services (EMS) are responsible for managing critically ill neonates during emergency response and interfacility transfers (IFTs), however, prehospital provider proficiency is challenged by low-frequency exposure rates. Understanding the emergency care utilisation and associated clinical interventions among this vulnerable population can inform future research and, ultimately, paramedicine training needs, strategic service planning, and system development.

methodsA retrospective review of electronic patient care records was conducted for neonates < 28 days old managed by the Western Cape public EMS in South Africa between 01 January 2022 and 31 December 2023. Electronic records were analysed for demographic, clinical presentations, and prehospital interventions using descriptive statistics, following STROBE reporting guidelines.

resultsNeonatal activations (n = 9,825) accounted for 0.7% of EMS activations during the study period, with interventions performed infrequently across the cohort, particularly high-risk procedures such as prehospital intubation (0.4%). Specialised retrieval teams (SRTs) managed a preponderance of high-acuity neonates requiring IFT relative to their caseload and were strongly associated with increased administration of advanced interventions. Non-SRT crews attended the majority of high acuity cases (3,206; 65.4%), despite being predominantly staffed by lower-qualified practitioners with limited neonatal scope of practice. The recorded incidence of mechanical ventilation (n = 451, 4.6%) was significantly higher than that of sedation/analgesia (n = 105, 1.1%).

conclusionThis study analysed the interventions and resources utilised by a public EMS to stabilise and transport neonates in a low-resource setting. Key findings included infrequent exposure to neonates, limited reporting of sedation and analgesia in mechanically ventilated patients, and the prevalence of specialised retrieval teams in managing high-acuity IFTs in this patient population.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaCritical Care Retrieval (CCR)Emergency Medical Services (EMS)Interfacility TransferNeonate transportsPrehospitalSpecialised Retrieval Teams (SRT)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.