ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Considerations for emergency airway management and resuscitation in cancer patients: a review.
Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) with malignancy or treatment-related critical illness, requiring airway intervention or resuscitation. Multiple factors such as anatomical distortion, treatment sequelae, frailty, and complex goals-of-care considerations create unique challenges. This narrative review aims to provide practical, evidence-informed guidance in airway management and resuscitation of oncologic patients.
methodsWe conducted a review of the literature addressing airway management, physiologic alterations associated with malignancy and cachexia, pharmacologic considerations for rapid sequence intubation, and resuscitation outcomes in cancer populations. We synthesized relevant clinical guidelines and studies to develop an overview of recommendations applicable to ED practice.
resultsCancer patients present numerous airway management challenges due to tumor or surgical airway alternations, post-radiation fibrosis, edema, and bleeding. Physiologic factors-including reduced functional residual capacity, anemia, muscle wasting, and systemic inflammation-shorten safe apnea time, increase risk of peri-intubation hypoxia, and hemodynamic instability. Malnutrition, organ dysfunction, and chemotherapy toxicity alter pharmacokinetics, necessitating individualized selection and dosing of induction and paralytic agents. Early anticipation of difficulties in airway management, optimized preoxygenation, advanced airway techniques, and multidisciplinary involvement are essential. Resuscitation planning must incorporate realistic prognostication and clear discussions regarding code status. Late or absent documentation of goals-of-care remains common.
conclusionsAirway management and resuscitation in cancer patients require a specialized, patient-centered approach. Future research should address comparative outcomes in the cancer population and support development of ED-specific oncologic protocols. Integration of structured goals-of-care frameworks and early palliative care help ensure ethically aligned, high-quality emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.