Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42920117›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2026

Considerations for emergency airway management and resuscitation in cancer patients: a review.

Wei-Lin Tallie Chua, Arif Azam, Monica Wattana, Tareg Bey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei-Lin Tallie ChuaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1468, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. chua.tallie@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-6389
Arif AzamDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1468, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4573-0607
Monica WattanaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1468, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-4974
Tareg BeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1468, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4151-3779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients frequently present to the emergency department (ED) with malignancy or treatment-related critical illness, requiring airway intervention or resuscitation. Multiple factors such as anatomical distortion, treatment sequelae, frailty, and complex goals-of-care considerations create unique challenges. This narrative review aims to provide practical, evidence-informed guidance in airway management and resuscitation of oncologic patients.

methodsWe conducted a review of the literature addressing airway management, physiologic alterations associated with malignancy and cachexia, pharmacologic considerations for rapid sequence intubation, and resuscitation outcomes in cancer populations. We synthesized relevant clinical guidelines and studies to develop an overview of recommendations applicable to ED practice.

resultsCancer patients present numerous airway management challenges due to tumor or surgical airway alternations, post-radiation fibrosis, edema, and bleeding. Physiologic factors-including reduced functional residual capacity, anemia, muscle wasting, and systemic inflammation-shorten safe apnea time, increase risk of peri-intubation hypoxia, and hemodynamic instability. Malnutrition, organ dysfunction, and chemotherapy toxicity alter pharmacokinetics, necessitating individualized selection and dosing of induction and paralytic agents. Early anticipation of difficulties in airway management, optimized preoxygenation, advanced airway techniques, and multidisciplinary involvement are essential. Resuscitation planning must incorporate realistic prognostication and clear discussions regarding code status. Late or absent documentation of goals-of-care remains common.

conclusionsAirway management and resuscitation in cancer patients require a specialized, patient-centered approach. Future research should address comparative outcomes in the cancer population and support development of ED-specific oncologic protocols. Integration of structured goals-of-care frameworks and early palliative care help ensure ethically aligned, high-quality emergency care.

Indexed as

AirwayCancerIntubationOncologyResuscitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.