ArticleBehavior research methods2026
A web-based spot-the-difference paradigm for studying social information processing in naturalistic visual scenes.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This pilot study introduced and assessed a novel web-based spot-the-difference paradigm for investigating social information processing in naturalistic visual scenes. The task systematically manipulated both the presence versus absence of social elements (i.e., social figures) and the location of the target difference (social vs. nonsocial regions). Participants identified differences via mouse clicks while their eye movements and mouse trajectories were recorded simultaneously throughout the task. In Study 1, behavioral and eye-tracking data supported the task's sensitivity to social salience, as evidenced by differences in accuracy and reaction times for social versus nonsocial target differences, along with consistently greater gaze fixation on social regions regardless of where the target difference appeared. In comparison, mouse-tracking data reflected more goal-oriented behavior, with cursor trajectories more frequently falling within regions containing the target difference. Study 2 further showed that this paradigm was sensitive to individual differences in autistic traits. Participants with higher autistic trait scores exhibited slower responses specifically in social contexts, irrespective of the location of the target difference, suggesting increased cognitive demands during social information processing. However, their gaze and mouse movement patterns remained comparable to those with lower autistic trait scores. Collectively, these findings suggest that this paradigm may provide a scalable and flexible approach for studying social cognition beyond traditional laboratory settings and may help capture the dynamic unfolding of social information processing through integrated multimodal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.