SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2026
SAGES surgical management of gastroparesis: systematic review and expert consensus.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastroparesis is a debilitating disease for which therapeutic strategies achieve variable success. This systematic review and consensus statements address the surgical management of medically refractory gastroparesis. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted, with a literature search through December 31, 2024, addressing the surgical treatment of gastroparesis, including gastric electrical stimulation (GES), gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM), pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy, and gastrectomy. Studies assessing symptom resolution and changes in gastric emptying were extracted. The findings were subsequently presented to a panel of surgeons and gastroenterologists, some of whom are members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), with the patient partner perspective considered. Consensus statements were generated from the presented data and subsequent discussion for each of the four treatment options.
resultsAll consensus statements were based on expert opinion due to poor and heterogeneous datasets for each intervention. The panel judged GES, pyloroplasty, and pyloromyotomy, including gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy, to be reasonable treatments for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis. The panel does not suggest surgical resection as a standard treatment option for medically refractory gastroparesis, but acknowledges that in specific patient cases, it may be reasonable.
conclusionsThe consensus views achieved provide guidance for surgical approaches to medically refractory gastroparesis. The panel also highlighted evidence gaps that warrant research to strengthen the evidence base for surgical treatment strategies for gastroparesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.