ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Real-world implementation of robot-assisted radical cystectomy at four Japanese institutions: perioperative outcomes, major complications, and mortality.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the implementation of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) at four Japanese institutions, focusing on perioperative outcomes, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3), and all-cause mortality within 90 days. We retrospectively analyzed 519 consecutive RARCs for bladder cancer (October 2014-March 2026). Each institution's series was divided chronologically into early (n = 261) and late (n = 258) halves to describe changes in practice (exploratory). Factors associated with major complications were assessed by logistic regression including institution. Survival among 90-day survivors (landmark analysis) was a secondary, exploratory outcome analyzed with Cox models stratified by institution. Within 90 days, 64 patients (12.3%) had a major complication (early 14.6% vs. late 10.1%; adjusted odds ratio 0.67 (95% CI 0.39-1.14)), and 13 (2.5%) died from any cause; six deaths (1.2%) were classified as complication-related. Patients who died were older and had poorer performance status. Pelvic lymph node dissection decreased from 95.4% to 83.3% (pNx, 4.6% to 16.7%), mainly at one institution, and pT3-4 disease decreased from 35.8% to 23.8%. Among 90-day survivors, the late phase was not significantly associated with overall survival (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.08), cancer-specific survival (0.65), or recurrence-free survival (0.74), and major complications were not associated with survival. In this multicenter series, about one in eight patients had a major complication and 2.5% died within 90 days. Differences between the early and late groups in tumor characteristics, lymph node dissection, and follow-up preclude attributing any difference in outcomes to surgical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42920004What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.