Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919999›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026

A proposed three‑dimensional anatomical definition and morphometric quantification of the lateral femoral wall: a reliable CT‑based measurement system validated across two software platforms.

Kun Zhang, Xianhui Wang, Gengxin Jia, Minfei Qiang, Xiaoyang Jia, Zhenqi Yang, Tianhao Shi, Yifan Cai, Qinghui Han, Yanxi Chen

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kun Zhang *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xianhui Wang *Department of Orthopedics, Putuo People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Gengxin Jia *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Minfei QiangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoyang JiaDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenqi YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Tianhao ShiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yifan CaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qinghui HanDepartment of Orthopedic Trauma, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yanxi ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai, 200032, China. cyxtongji@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4021-6020

Funding

Medical and Health Program of the Science and Technology Commission of Baoshan District, Shanghai 2023-E-40National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272479Research and Development Fund of Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital 2023ZSFZ29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe lateral femoral wall serves as a critical determinant of intertrochanteric fracture stability, internal fixation strategy, and postoperative clinical outcomes, and has emerged as one of the core research focuses in orthopedic trauma. However, no consensus exists on the anatomical boundaries, standardized measurement criteria, and morphometric parameter system of the lateral femoral wall.

methodsConsecutive individuals aged 18 years and above who had full-length or upper-half CT scans of the femur were included from January 2015 to June 2024. Complete three‑dimensional boundaries and a comprehensive measurement system for the lateral femoral wall were established. All morphometric parameters were independently quantified using two software platforms (Mimics and SuperImage). Statistical analyses were performed to assess inter‑software consistency, intra‑ and inter‑observer reliability, sex‑based morphological differences, and correlations between lateral wall morphology and age as well as body height.

resultsA total of 171 participants were enrolled in this study, consisting of 91 females and 80 males. No statistically significant inter-software differences were detected for any of the morphometric parameters (all P > 0.05). Inter-software measurements showed significant positive correlations (Pearson r = 0.740-0.986, all P < 0.001), and no systematic bias via Bland-Altman analyses. Intra- and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) revealed substantial to almost perfect agreement for the central coronal curvature diameter (0.811-0.836, 95% CIs 0.764-0.876), while all other morphometric parameters achieved almost perfect agreement, with intra-observer ICCs of 0.858-0.993 and inter-observer ICCs of 0.841-0.984. Significant sexual dimorphisms were observed: males had greater lateral wall height, segmental width and cortical thickness at most planes (all P < 0.05). Body height was the dominant positive determinant of most morphological parameters (ρ = 0.194 to 0.909, all P < 0.05), whereas age exerted only mild-to-moderate negative effects on segmental width and thickness (ρ = - 0.578 to - 0.174, all P < 0.05). Significant positive width-thickness correlations existed at all transverse planes (all P < 0.001). Notably, the central coronal curvature diameter showed no sex-related difference (P = 0.216) and remained stable across age and height subgroups.

conclusionThis study proposed a reliable 3D measurement system for the lateral femoral wall with complete anatomical boundary definition. The central coronal curvature, independent of sex, age and height, can act as a universal baseline contour for implant design. In contrast, its overall dimensions differ across sex and height, supporting patient‑specific implant sizing.

Indexed as

FemurImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareFemurImaging, three-dimensionalIntraclass correlation coefficientLateral femoral wallMorphometryUpper femoral diaphysis

Identifiers

PMID42919999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.