ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Gynecomastia Donut Excision Technique Description and Review of Literature.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynecomastia is benign enlargement of male breast tissue that may cause psychological distress and aesthetic concerns. Surgical correction can be complicated by scarring, contour irregularities, and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) deformity.
methodsThis article presents a narrative review and describes a surgical technique involving preoperative marking, VASER-assisted liposuction, circumferential de-epithelialization, controlled glandular excision, preservation of dermoglandular tissue beneath the NAC, and staged closure.
resultsThe described approach combines contouring with preservation of NAC support and a staged closure intended to distribute tension. The photographs illustrate preoperative and postoperative appearances; comparative effectiveness, complication rates, and long-term outcomes have not been established.
conclusionsDonut excision with dermoglandular preservation and staged closure is a described approach to gynecomastia correction. Comparative studies with longer follow-up and standardized patient-reported outcomes are needed to evaluate its safety and aesthetic benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42919991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.