ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026
Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurology: biomarkers and clinical implications.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a shared downstream pathogenic mechanism across a wide spectrum of neurological disorders, ranging from primary mitochondrial diseases to conditions including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, hereditary ataxias and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. This Review examines the role of mitochondrial biomarkers in improving diagnostic accuracy, patient stratification and monitoring of disease progression and therapeutic response. Primary mitochondrial diseases are presented as proof-of-concept models of impaired oxidative phosphorylation, providing a framework for biomarker identification and validation with translational relevance to other neurological diseases. Mitochondrial biomarkers can be broadly categorized into four domains: fluid biomarkers, reflecting metabolic alterations and stress signalling; genetic biomarkers, capturing mitochondrial DNA integrity and dynamics; multi-omics approaches, integrating transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic signatures; and imaging biomarkers, enabling in vivo assessment of structural and functional consequences of mitochondrial dysfunction. Across disorders, these biomarkers reveal shared disturbances in bioenergetics, redox homeostasis, mitochondrial genome maintenance and inflammatory signalling. However, clinical implementation remains limited by methodological heterogeneity, biological variability and reduced disease specificity. Integrated, multimodal biomarker strategies, combined with longitudinal validation, will be essential for supporting precision medicine and guiding the development of therapies to target mitochondrial pathways in neurology.
Identifiers
42919989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.