Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919984›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Privileged representational axes in biological and artificial neural networks.

Meenakshi Khosla, Sudhanshu Srivastava, Alex H Williams, Josh McDermott, Nancy Kanwisher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meenakshi KhoslaDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. mkhosla@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2910-6242
Sudhanshu SrivastavaDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Alex H WilliamsCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Josh McDermottMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3965-2503
Nancy KanwisherMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3853-7885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do neurons code information? Recent work emphasizes the geometry and information content of population codes, using measures that are blind to the native tunings (or 'axes') of neural responses. But might these representational axes matter, with some privileged systematically over others? We developed methods to test for alignment of neural tuning across brains and deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs). Across both vision and audition, both brains and DCNNs consistently favoured certain axes for representing the natural world. Moreover, the representational axes of DCNNs trained on natural inputs were aligned to those in perceptual cortices, such that axis-sensitive model-brain similarity metrics better differentiated competing models of biological sensory systems. We further show that coding schemes that privilege certain axes can facilitate task performance, reduce downstream wiring costs and improve generalization. These results motivate a new framework for understanding neural tuning in biological and artificial networks and its computational benefits.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.