Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42919974›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026

Microbiome interactions in renal cell carcinoma: evidence, challenges and opportunities.

Cecilie Lindgaard, Astrid Korning Hvidt, Anna Krarup Keller, Louise Thingholm, Sara Schou Kristensen, Iben Lyskjær

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cecilie LindgaardDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6813-5665
Astrid Korning HvidtDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-1846
Anna Krarup KellerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Louise ThingholmDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sara Schou KristensenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Iben LyskjærDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. iben.lyskjar@clin.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3446-1182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a heterogeneous malignancy with limited predictive biomarkers to guide treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that the microbiome might influence systemic immunity, therapeutic response and clinical outcomes. In metastatic RCC, the gut microbiome has been linked to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors, whereas the existence of a tumour microbiome remains a topic of debate. Circulating microbial DNA in blood has been proposed as a minimally invasive window into systemic immune status, offering a potential tool for monitoring treatment response, but its role in RCC is largely unexplored. Evidence from mechanistic studies, primarily from other solid cancer types, suggests that microbiome-immune crosstalk, microbial metabolites and functionally redundant pathways across taxa could modulate tumour biology. However, progress in RCC microbiome research remains limited by small cohorts, methodological variability and challenges in working with samples with a low microbial biomass, which are highly prone to contamination. Emerging spatial and multi-omics technologies now enable high-resolution mapping of these complex interactions, offering the potential to transform our understanding of the cancer microbiome. A structured roadmap is required to overcome technical and analytical challenges in RCC microbiome studies, enabling the identification of clinically relevant microbial signatures and their role in shaping tumour immunity.

Identifiers

PMID42919974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.